Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Great idea from Switzerland

Let's start off with a real winner!

Fines for traffic citations in Switzerland are based on the offender's income (as well as on the nature of the offense). As a result, this very wealthy idiot who was driving his Mercedes over 180mph will have to pay of fine of roughly $1.4 million. See the story here

I love the idea of linking fines to income. It is an easy source of revenue from the government; it discourages dangerous behavior; and, it seems much more fair than our system of having the same fines for everyone. For a poor college student, a $200 ticket might mean a diet of ramen noodles and Natty Light for month. For an ordinary worker, it is a big dent in the monthly budget. For Bill Gates, it is about what he makes about every 5 seconds. The Swiss system at least partially equalizes the pain that each offender experiences.

What is the downside? It really doesn't do much to reduce income inequality or to raise revenue, but it sure feels right.

What might be the unintended consequences? People in expensive cars might become the prime targets of traffic enforcement (sounds like another benefit to me). It could create incentives for bribery. I am not sure how much it would take to bribe the local police officer to let me off with a warning, but I suspect that it is more than than the fine for the traffic violation. On the other hand, if Richie Rich is looking at a $1 million ticket, he might offer a large enough bribe to tempt an otherwise honest cop (or traffic court judge). I am willing to take that risk.

This idea is loaded with potassium goodness: Five Bananas!



Welcome to Bananaman's blog

Welcome to Bananaman's blog. Bananaman believes several things:

  • The level of wealth inequality in society today is immoral.
  • Government spending is needed to achieve long-term goals.
  • Protecting the environment is essential to the future of civilization.

If you believe that the gap between the rich and poor is not a problem, government spending is inherently bad, and/or that climate change is a myth, this blog is not for you.

This blog will consider ideas (large and small) that redistribute wealth from the 1% to the 99%, enable ordinary people to effectively exercise political power, encourage socially desirable behaviors, and invest in the long-term needs of society.

Bananaman is interested in ideas that are "outside the box" and is not especially interested whether or not these ideas are feasible in the short term. Each idea should be considered on its merits. At the same time, Bananaman firmly believes that all ideas should be evaluated based on evidence and that many well-meaning ideas have negative unintended consequences.

Bananaman will rate ideas on the Banana Scale


Five Bananas: Great idea!


Four Bananas: Seems Promising


Three Bananas: Good idea. Might have some problems


Two Bananas: Well intentioned but flawed

One Banana: This won't work





No Bananas: This is just stupid!


Join Bananaman as he unpeels interesting ideas.